0x09d2...67dc
74.4/ 100
Moral Scorei
Unranked
Trust DegreesTrust degrees measure how close an address is to known moral actors. 1st degree addresses were directly identified by the MORALS founder (Phase 1 airdrop) or proclaimed good by the community in later airdrop phases. 2nd degree addresses have been proclaimed good by a 1st degree address. 3rd degree by a 2nd degree address. Higher degrees carry more weight in the moral score calculation.
Vote weight by degree:
1st degree = 1.00 · 2nd degree = 0.50
3rd degree = 0.25 · Unranked = 0.01
This address has not yet been proclaimed good by a trusted address.
1,000
$MORALS received
300
$MORALS given
Given vs received
Gives 23% · Receives 77% — ratio 0.30:1
GivenReceived
All-time: Proclaimed good by 1 person
This address has not yet been identified as morally bad.
Proclaim good:
Sends 1 million MORALS to
0x09d2...67dc
Proclaim bad:
Sends 0.001 MORALS to
0x09d2...67dc

Morals data is user-generated, and reflects aggregated community sentiment. These Moral Scores do not constitute endorsement, financial advice, or factual assessment of character by the Morals team.


Transaction history

TimeFromToAmountType
May 310x09d2...67dc@civilmonkey100Good
May 310x09d2...67dc0xeede...8d4f100Good
May 310x09d2...67dctalesoftasern.eth100Good
May 310xe2a4...ac100x09d2...67dc1,000Good

MORALS received

TimeFromAmountType
May 310xe2a4...ac101,000Good

MORALS sent

TimeToAmountType
May 31@civilmonkey100Good
May 310xeede...8d4f100Good
May 31talesoftasern.eth100Good
“vitalik.eth” “@dwr” “celebrities” “July 30 2015” “is it moral to freeze stolen funds”