@schulkin
68.3/ 100
Moral Scorei
1st Degree
Trust DegreesTrust degrees measure how close an address is to known moral actors. 1st degree addresses were directly identified by the MORALS founder (Phase 1 airdrop) or proclaimed good by the community in later airdrop phases. 2nd degree addresses have been proclaimed good by a 1st degree address. 3rd degree by a 2nd degree address. Higher degrees carry more weight in the moral score calculation.
Vote weight by degree:
1st degree = 1.00 · 2nd degree = 0.50
3rd degree = 0.25 · Unranked = 0.01
This address received a Phase 1 airdrop from the Morals founder for this reason: Farcaster /climate channel lead.
@schulkinNeynar: 0.98BaseScan
329.5M
$MORALS received
12.0M
$MORALS given
Given vs received
Gives 4% · Receives 96% — ratio 0.04:1
GivenReceived
All-time: Proclaimed good by 1 person
This address has not yet been identified as morally bad.
Proclaim good:
Sends 1 million MORALS to
@schulkin
Proclaim bad:
Sends 0.001 MORALS to
@schulkin

Morals data is user-generated, and reflects aggregated community sentiment. These Moral Scores do not constitute endorsement, financial advice, or factual assessment of character by the Morals team.


Transaction history

TimeFromToAmountType
2d ago@schulkin@vitalik.eth1.0MGood
2d ago@schulkin@rsa.eth1.0MGood
2d ago@schulkin@montymerlin1.0MGood
2d ago@schulkin@abundance1.0MGood
2d ago@schulkin@maearth1.0MGood
2d ago@schulkin@owocki1.0MGood
2d ago@schulkin@july1.0MGood
2d ago@schulkin@griff.eth1.0MGood
2d ago@schulkinlandua.eth1.0MGood
2d ago@schulkin@nor1.0MGood

MORALS received

TimeFromAmountType
May 190xa868...289d329.5MGood

MORALS sent

TimeToAmountType
2d ago@vitalik.eth1.0MGood
2d ago@rsa.eth1.0MGood
2d ago@montymerlin1.0MGood
2d ago@abundance1.0MGood
2d ago@maearth1.0MGood
2d ago@owocki1.0MGood
2d ago@july1.0MGood
2d ago@griff.eth1.0MGood
2d agolandua.eth1.0MGood
2d ago@nor1.0MGood
“vitalik.eth” “@dwr” “celebrities” “July 30 2015” “is it moral to freeze stolen funds”