0xB7a0...d6DC
74.4/ 100
Moral Scorei
Unranked
Trust DegreesTrust degrees measure how close an address is to known moral actors. 1st degree addresses were directly identified by the MORALS founder (Phase 1 airdrop) or proclaimed good by the community in later airdrop phases. 2nd degree addresses have been proclaimed good by a 1st degree address. 3rd degree by a 2nd degree address. Higher degrees carry more weight in the moral score calculation.
Vote weight by degree:
1st degree = 1.00 · 2nd degree = 0.50
3rd degree = 0.25 · Unranked = 0.01
This address has not yet been proclaimed good by a trusted address.
1,000
$MORALS received
200
$MORALS given
Given vs received
Gives 17% · Receives 83% — ratio 0.20:1
GivenReceived
All-time: Proclaimed good by 1 person
This address has not yet been identified as morally bad.
Proclaim good:
Sends 1 million MORALS to
0xB7a0...d6DC
Proclaim bad:
Sends 0.001 MORALS to
0xB7a0...d6DC

Morals data is user-generated, and reflects aggregated community sentiment. These Moral Scores do not constitute endorsement, financial advice, or factual assessment of character by the Morals team.


Transaction history

TimeFromToAmountType
May 310xB7a0...d6DC0xeede...8d4f100Good
May 310xB7a0...d6DCtalesoftasern.eth100Good
May 310xe2a4...ac100xB7a0...d6DC1,000Good

MORALS received

TimeFromAmountType
May 310xe2a4...ac101,000Good

MORALS sent

TimeToAmountType
May 310xeede...8d4f100Good
May 31talesoftasern.eth100Good
“vitalik.eth” “@dwr” “celebrities” “July 30 2015” “is it moral to freeze stolen funds”