@barmstrong
barmstrong.eth
89.5/ 100
Moral Scorei
2nd Degree
Trust DegreesTrust degrees measure how close an address is to known moral actors. 1st degree addresses were directly identified by the MORALS founder (Phase 1 airdrop) or proclaimed good by the community in later airdrop phases. 2nd degree addresses have been proclaimed good by a 1st degree address. 3rd degree by a 2nd degree address. Higher degrees carry more weight in the moral score calculation.
Vote weight by degree:
1st degree = 1.00 · 2nd degree = 0.50
3rd degree = 0.25 · Unranked = 0.01
This address was proclaimed good by a 1st degree address, granting 2nd degree trust.
10,000
$MORALS received
0
$MORALS given
Given vs received
Gives 0% · Receives 100% — ratio 0.00:1
GivenReceived
All-time: Proclaimed good by 1 person and bad by 1 person
Proclaim good:
Sends 1 million MORALS to
@barmstrong
Proclaim bad:
Sends 0.001 MORALS to
@barmstrong

Morals data is user-generated, and reflects aggregated community sentiment. These Moral Scores do not constitute endorsement, financial advice, or factual assessment of character by the Morals team.



Transaction history

TimeFromToAmountType
Jul 22@wake@barmstrong0.0000Bad
Jul 22@duckfacts.eth@barmstrong10,000Good

MORALS received

TimeFromAmountType
Jul 22@wake0.0000Bad
Jul 22@duckfacts.eth10,000Good
“vitalik.eth” “@dwr” “celebrities” “July 30 2015” “is it moral to freeze stolen funds”