@hamedns
81/ 100
Moral Scorei
Unranked
Trust DegreesTrust degrees measure how close an address is to known moral actors. 1st degree addresses were directly identified by the MORALS founder (Phase 1 airdrop) or proclaimed good by the community in later airdrop phases. 2nd degree addresses have been proclaimed good by a 1st degree address. 3rd degree by a 2nd degree address. Higher degrees carry more weight in the moral score calculation.
Vote weight by degree:
1st degree = 1.00 · 2nd degree = 0.50
3rd degree = 0.25 · Unranked = 0.01
This address has not yet been proclaimed good by a trusted address.
@hamednsNeynar: 0.98BaseScan
2
$MORALS received
4
$MORALS given
Given vs received
Gives 67% · Receives 33% — ratio 2.00:1
GivenReceived
All-time: Proclaimed good by 2 people
This address has not yet been identified as morally bad.
Proclaim good:
Sends 1 million MORALS to
@hamedns
Proclaim bad:
Sends 0.001 MORALS to
@hamedns

Morals data is user-generated, and reflects aggregated community sentiment. These Moral Scores do not constitute endorsement, financial advice, or factual assessment of character by the Morals team.


Transaction history

TimeFromToAmountType
Jul 24@hamedns@arjantupan1Good
Jul 240x7934...9462@hamedns1Good
Jul 24@hamedns0x7934...94621Good
Jul 24@hamedns@niloofarmd1Good
Jul 24@hamedns@dandelion1Good
Jul 23@arjantupan@hamedns1Good

MORALS received

TimeFromAmountType
Jul 240x7934...94621Good
Jul 23@arjantupan1Good

MORALS sent

TimeToAmountType
Jul 24@arjantupan1Good
Jul 240x7934...94621Good
Jul 24@niloofarmd1Good
Jul 24@dandelion1Good
“vitalik.eth” “@dwr” “celebrities” “July 30 2015” “is it moral to freeze stolen funds”